Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Separate Opinion (Concurring) of the Judge of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine Vasyl Lemak regarding the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the Case of the Constitutional Complaint by Artur Volodymyrovych Boiarov concerning the Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of the First Paragraph of Part Five of Article 380 of the Customs Code of Ukraine (on the Protection of Customs Interests of Ukraine)

Separate Opinion of Constitutional Court of Ukraine Judge Vasyl Lemak Regarding the Methodology for Assessing the Constitutionality of Human Rights Restrictions on the Example of Customs Legislation.

The judge proposes a new algorithm for assessing the constitutionality of state interference in human rights:

  • First, it is necessary to check whether the essence (core) of the right has been violated
  • If the essence of the right has not been violated – evaluate the proportionality of the restriction
  • Investigate the legitimate purpose of the restriction and its connection with constitutional values

Key positions of the judge:

  • The concept of ‘prescribed by law’ is not limited to laws of Ukraine, but also includes other normative acts issued on the basis of law
  • Systemic and massive restrictions on rights can be established exclusively by laws of Ukraine
  • When assessing constitutionality, it is important to consider not only formal requirements, but also the quality of the law – its accessibility, precision, and predictability

Full text by link

Leave a comment

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password