Here is the translation of the legal analysis:
1. Subject of Dispute: Termination of the land lease agreement for a plot of 2.12 hectares and its return to the owner due to non-use for its intended purpose.
2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court indicated that the courts of previous instances incorrectly assessed the grounds of the prosecutor’s claim. In particular, non-payment of rent and failure to develop the land plot may be grounds for contract termination if it significantly violates the rights of the lessor. The court drew attention that it is necessary to evaluate not only the fact of violation, but also its materiality and consequences.
3. Court Decision: Previous court decisions were canceled and the case was referred for a new review to conduct a detailed assessment of all circumstances of the case and arguments of the parties.
