Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Declaring the state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” for a non-residential premises previously owned by the state as illegal.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– Corporatization of a state enterprise is not privatization
– Transfer of property to the authorized capital of a joint-stock company does not change the property ownership form
– State property transferred to the authorized capital of a state joint-stock company remains state-owned
– Change of ownership form is possible exclusively through privatization
3. Court Decision: Cancel the state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” for the non-residential premises and recognize the ownership right for the state.
: The court deviated from previous judicial practice, clearly defining the legal regime of property of state joint-stock companies.
