Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the illegal transfer of a forestry land plot into private ownership and its return to the state.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– The prosecutor cannot represent the interests of a state enterprise in court
– Declaring decisions and agreements invalid is not an effective method of protecting property rights
– The land plot was unlawfully removed from state possession, as the legally established procedure was not followed during its alienation
– The court has the right to independently determine the method of protecting the violated right
3. Court Decision: The case was partially referred for a new hearing to clarify the method of protecting the state’s right to the land plot.
Key Thesis: The court supported the principle of protecting state property, but pointed out the need for proper legal formulation of the claim.
