Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Decision of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the Case of the Constitutional Complaint by Artur Volodymyrovych Boiarov Regarding the Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of the First Paragraph of Part Five of Article 380 of the Customs Code of Ukraine (Concerning the Protection of Ukraine’s Customs Interests)

Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Constitutionality of the Customs Code of Ukraine Norm

The decision concerns the constitutionality of a norm in the Customs Code of Ukraine that limits the use of temporarily imported personal vehicles exclusively to the citizens who imported them. Structurally, the decision consists of an analysis of:
• Property rights under the Constitution of Ukraine and international treaties
• Possibilities of property rights limitation by the state
• Compliance of the limitation with proportionality and legal certainty criteria

Key Provisions:
• The Constitutional Court recognized the norm as constitutional, as the property rights limitation is proportional and justified for protecting the state’s customs interests
• The limitation is temporary and applies only while the vehicle is on the customs territory of Ukraine
• The owner has the right to choose the customs regime and can modify it
• The prohibition does not apply to yachts and other leisure watercraft
• There is no liability for transferring the vehicle if the person who imported it is present in the vehicle

Full text by link

Leave a comment

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password