{"id":8154,"date":"2025-04-10T11:10:10","date_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:10:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-522-21035-20-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-10T11:10:10","modified_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:10:10","slug":"case-no-522-21035-20-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-522-21035-20-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 522\/21035\/20 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal text summary:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Determination of minor children’s place of residence and child support collection between parents after divorce.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court pointed out fundamental procedural errors by the appellate court in case consideration. Specifically:<\/p>\n

– The court did not investigate the actual relationships between children and parents
\n– Did not hear the children’s opinion
\n– Did not verify the living conditions of children with the mother
\n– Did not assess the psychological impact of changing the place of residence on the children<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court’s resolution and refer the case for new consideration.<\/p>\n

The court emphasized that the most important aspect is adhering to the children’s interests, not the parents’ ambitions.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal text summary: 1. Subject of Dispute: Determination of minor children’s place of residence and child support collection between parents after divorce. 2. Main Court Arguments: The Supreme Court pointed out fundamental procedural errors by the appellate court in case consideration. Specifically: – The court did not investigate the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}