{"id":8148,"date":"2025-04-10T11:06:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-400-6530-21-dated-04-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-10T11:06:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:06:00","slug":"case-no-400-6530-21-dated-04-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-400-6530-21-dated-04-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 400\/6530\/21 dated 04\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the analysis of the court decision:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of the dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s actions as unlawful regarding pension calculation without taking into account indexation for a pensioner residing in Israel.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main arguments of the court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Pension Fund performed pension recalculation in accordance with the legislation<br \/>\n&#8211; Pension indexation is mandatory under the legislation<br \/>\n&#8211; The court pointed out that the pensioner has the right to indexation regardless of the place of residence<br \/>\n&#8211; Previous courts incorrectly assessed the circumstances of the case and did not investigate the issue of actual indexation<\/p>\n<p>3. Court decision: Repeal previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to thoroughly examine the circumstances of pension indexation.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126377686\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the analysis of the court decision: 1. Subject of the dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s actions as unlawful regarding pension calculation without taking into account indexation for a pensioner residing in Israel. 2. Main arguments of the court: &#8211; The Pension Fund performed pension recalculation in accordance with the legislation &#8211; Pension&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8148","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8148","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8148"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8148\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}