{"id":8144,"date":"2025-04-10T11:04:36","date_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:04:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-308-6268-16-c-dated-02-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-10T11:04:36","modified_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:04:36","slug":"case-no-308-6268-16-c-dated-02-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-308-6268-16-c-dated-02-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 308\/6268\/16-c dated 02\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor demands to cancel the city council’s decision and recover land plots transferred to an individual and subsequently incorporated into the company’s statutory capital.<\/p>\n

Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n

1. Part of the claim regarding the recovery of land plots from LLC “United Energy Systems” is subject to consideration in an economic, rather than civil court, as it concerns a dispute between legal entities.<\/p>\n

2. The court deviates from previous practice and clearly defines that cases of property recovery between legal entities must be considered in economic courts.<\/p>\n

3. The other part of the claims (regarding cancellation of city council decisions) may be considered in civil proceedings, as it relates to the transfer of ownership rights to an individual.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: Partially satisfy the cassation appeal of LLC, canceling the appellate court’s decision on land plot recovery and maintaining the local court’s decision to close proceedings in this part.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor demands to cancel the city council’s decision and recover land plots transferred to an individual and subsequently incorporated into the company’s statutory capital. Main Court Arguments: 1. Part of the claim regarding the recovery of land plots from LLC “United Energy Systems” is subject to consideration in an economic, rather…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}