{"id":8140,"date":"2025-04-10T11:03:06","date_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-757-2965-15-c-dated-04-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-10T11:03:06","modified_gmt":"2025-04-10T08:03:06","slug":"case-no-757-2965-15-c-dated-04-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-757-2965-15-c-dated-04-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 757\/2965\/15-c dated 04\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The case concerns the recovery of debt under a credit agreement between PrivatBank and an individual.<\/p>\n<p>Main arguments of the court:<br \/>\n1. The bank provided a loan of 218,000 US dollars, but the borrower did not fulfill the obligations to repay the loan.<br \/>\n2. The court recognized that the remuneration for &#8220;providing a financial instrument&#8221; cannot be collected, as it is not a separate service, but part of the lending process.<br \/>\n3. Expert opinions regarding the amount of debt were critically analyzed by the court, and the most substantiated calculation option was chosen.<\/p>\n<p>The court decided to partially satisfy the bank&#8217;s claim and recover 139,412.38 US dollars of debt from the borrower.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126362799\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The case concerns the recovery of debt under a credit agreement between PrivatBank and an individual. Main arguments of the court: 1. The bank provided a loan of 218,000 US dollars, but the borrower did not fulfill the obligations to repay the loan. 2. The court recognized that the remuneration for &#8220;providing a financial instrument&#8221;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8140\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}