{"id":8124,"date":"2025-04-10T10:56:04","date_gmt":"2025-04-10T07:56:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-903-135-23-903-584-24-dated-26-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-10T10:56:04","modified_gmt":"2025-04-10T07:56:04","slug":"case-no-903-135-23-903-584-24-dated-26-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-903-135-23-903-584-24-dated-26-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 903\/135\/23 (903\/584\/24) dated 26\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of an additional agreement on returnable financial assistance between two interconnected farming enterprises in a bankruptcy case.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the appellate court violated procedural norms by not involving PE “FG “Western Bug” as a third party to the case, which is a party to the disputed transaction. The court noted that a decision regarding the rights of such a person without their participation in the case is unlawful, as it violates their procedural rights to a fair trial.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court revoked previous court decisions and referred the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance with instructions to properly clarify the composition of participants in the judicial process.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of an additional agreement on returnable financial assistance between two interconnected farming enterprises in a bankruptcy case. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the appellate court violated procedural norms by not involving PE “FG “Western Bug” as a third party to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}