{"id":8092,"date":"2025-04-10T10:43:06","date_gmt":"2025-04-10T07:43:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-760-6831-22-dated-02-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-10T10:43:06","modified_gmt":"2025-04-10T07:43:06","slug":"case-no-760-6831-22-dated-02-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-760-6831-22-dated-02-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 760\/6831\/22 dated 02\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute: Recovery of monetary funds in the amount of 95,900 US dollars, which were allegedly provided under a loan agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Main arguments of the court: The court established that the receipts for receiving money do not contain a clear obligation to return the funds, but are actually documents about the transfer of corporate rights in the authorized capital of LLC &#8220;UKRA-IR&#8221;. Later, the plaintiff received three apartments in exchange for his corporate rights and signed a receipt about the absence of claims, which additionally confirms the absence of debt obligations.<\/p>\n<p>Court decision: The Supreme Court left the plaintiff&#8217;s cassation appeal unsatisfied and supported the appellate court&#8217;s decision to refuse recovery of monetary funds.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126328734\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute: Recovery of monetary funds in the amount of 95,900 US dollars, which were allegedly provided under a loan agreement. Main arguments of the court: The court established that the receipts for receiving money do not contain a clear obligation to return the funds, but are actually documents about the transfer of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8092"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8092\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}