{"id":8003,"date":"2025-04-07T10:37:42","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:37:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-521-18588-21-dated-02-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T10:37:42","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:37:42","slug":"case-no-521-18588-21-dated-02-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-521-18588-21-dated-02-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 521\/18588\/21 dated 02\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Claiming a Lexus LX 570 from a Bona Fide Acquirer and Recognition of Ownership Rights.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and established that if the owner voluntarily transferred the vehicle to another person (in this case, PERSON_1 transferred the car to PERSON_3), such a vehicle cannot be claimed from subsequent bona fide acquirers. The court considers that the owner in such a situation bears the risk of choosing a counterparty and can protect their rights only by recovering damages from the person to whom the property was transferred.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court cancelled previous court decisions and denied PERSON_1&#8217;s claim for vehicle recovery, charging court expenses in favor of PERSON_2.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126328730\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Claiming a Lexus LX 570 from a Bona Fide Acquirer and Recognition of Ownership Rights. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and established that if the owner voluntarily transferred the vehicle to another person (in this case, PERSON_1 transferred the car to PERSON_3), such a&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8003"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8003\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}