{"id":8001,"date":"2025-04-07T10:37:19","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:37:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-372-3914-23-dated-02-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T10:37:19","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:37:19","slug":"case-no-372-3914-23-dated-02-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-372-3914-23-dated-02-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 372\/3914\/23 dated 02\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Employee Dismissal as Illegal and Recovery of Average Earnings for the Period of Forced Absence<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The employer did not prove the systematic nature of labor discipline violations by the employee<br \/>\n&#8211; The dismissal order did not contain clear substantiations of the disciplinary misconduct<br \/>\n&#8211; The court deviated from previous practice regarding the calculation of average earnings for mobilized employees<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partially Satisfy the Claim &#8211; Reinstate the Employee in Position and Recover Average Earnings for the Period from 07\/06\/2023 to 02\/15\/2024 in the Amount of 1,058,174.70 UAH.<\/p>\n<p>Key Feature of the Decision &#8211; Reduction of Average Earnings Due to Employee&#8217;s Conscription for Military Service.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126328719\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Employee Dismissal as Illegal and Recovery of Average Earnings for the Period of Forced Absence 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; The employer did not prove the systematic nature of labor discipline violations by the employee &#8211; The dismissal order did not contain clear substantiations of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}