{"id":7997,"date":"2025-04-07T10:34:56","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:34:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-947-17168-22-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T10:34:56","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:34:56","slug":"case-no-947-17168-22-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-947-17168-22-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 947\/17168\/22 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Assignment of Claims under Credit and Mortgage Agreements between Individuals and the Company.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>1. The court deviated from previous practice and established that assignment of claims under a credit agreement may occur not only in favor of financial institutions.<\/p>\n<p>2. In this case, the bank &#8220;Porto-Franco&#8221; was in the liquidation procedure and therefore had the right to sell assets to any person on a competitive basis.<\/p>\n<p>3. The original assignment of claims agreement was concluded during the bank&#8217;s liquidation process following an auction, which makes subsequent agreements lawful.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Reject the claim for invalidation of assignment of claims agreements and recover court expenses from the plaintiff in favor of the defendant.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126328502\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Assignment of Claims under Credit and Mortgage Agreements between Individuals and the Company. Main Court Arguments: 1. The court deviated from previous practice and established that assignment of claims under a credit agreement may occur not only in favor of financial institutions. 2. In this case, the bank &#8220;Porto-Franco&#8221; was&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7997","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7997"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7997\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}