{"id":7991,"date":"2025-04-07T10:31:33","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:31:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-442-7804-24-dated-02-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T10:31:33","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:31:33","slug":"case-no-442-7804-24-dated-02-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-442-7804-24-dated-02-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 442\/7804\/24 dated 02\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis of the Court Decision:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the actions of a state executor regarding the calculation of alimony debt through currency conversion to euros.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; Currency conversion must be carried out at the official exchange rate of the National Bank of Ukraine on the day of payment in favor of the claimant.<br \/>\n&#8211; During martial law and currency purchase restrictions, the executor may convert funds at the NBU exchange rate on the day of payment.<br \/>\n&#8211; Such procedure corresponds to the interests of the claimant and current legislation.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court canceled previous court decisions and rejected the claimant&#8217;s complaint against the actions of the state executor.<\/p>\n<p>Important: This decision demonstrates a change in previous judicial practice regarding currency conversion procedures in enforcement proceedings.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126328711\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis of the Court Decision: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the actions of a state executor regarding the calculation of alimony debt through currency conversion to euros. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; Currency conversion must be carried out at the official exchange rate of the National Bank of Ukraine on the day of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7991"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7991\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}