{"id":7987,"date":"2025-04-07T10:30:27","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-524-11562-21-dated-26-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T10:30:27","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:30:27","slug":"case-no-524-11562-21-dated-26-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-524-11562-21-dated-26-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 524\/11562\/21 dated 26\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the Apartment Purchase and Sale Agreement and Cancellation of Property Ownership Registration.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>The court deviates from previous practice and indicates that a representative may act in the interests of heirs even after the principal&#8217;s death, if this is related to urgent matters or prevention of damages. In this case, there is no evidence that the representative acted contrary to the heirs&#8217; interests, therefore the contract cannot be declared invalid. Moreover, the court believes that the plaintiff should have filed a vindication claim, rather than challenging the contract.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Reject the claim for invalidation of the purchase and sale agreement and cancellation of property ownership registration, recovering court costs from the plaintiff in favor of the defendant.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126328420\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the Apartment Purchase and Sale Agreement and Cancellation of Property Ownership Registration. Main Arguments of the Court: The court deviates from previous practice and indicates that a representative may act in the interests of heirs even after the principal&#8217;s death, if this is related to urgent matters or prevention of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7987\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}