{"id":7981,"date":"2025-04-07T10:27:06","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:27:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-260-10920-23-dated-02-04-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T10:27:06","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T07:27:06","slug":"case-no-260-10920-23-dated-02-04-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-260-10920-23-dated-02-04-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 260\/10920\/23 dated 02\/04\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: A Serviceman&#8217;s Right to Compensation for Loss of Income Due to Violation of Indexation Payment Terms for Monetary Allowance.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. Indexation and compensation funds are a component of wages with a compensatory nature, aimed at maintaining the employee&#8217;s real income level.<br \/>\n2. The court deviates from previous practice and considers that such disputes should be subject to the terms of the Labor Code (3 months), rather than administrative proceedings (1 month).<br \/>\n3. The dispute about indexation of monetary allowance is essentially a labor dispute about wages, despite the fact that the plaintiff is a serviceman.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court&#8217;s resolution and refer the case for a new hearing.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126311314\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: A Serviceman&#8217;s Right to Compensation for Loss of Income Due to Violation of Indexation Payment Terms for Monetary Allowance. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. Indexation and compensation funds are a component of wages with a compensatory nature, aimed at maintaining the employee&#8217;s real income level. 2. The court deviates from previous&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}