{"id":7931,"date":"2025-04-06T10:17:47","date_gmt":"2025-04-06T07:17:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-335-10236-23-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-06T10:17:47","modified_gmt":"2025-04-06T07:17:47","slug":"case-no-335-10236-23-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-335-10236-23-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 335\/10236\/23 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Moral Damages from the State due to Illegal Administrative Prosecution by Patrol Police Officers.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court established that the appellate court approached the case circumstances formally. Firstly, the previous court proceeding established a violation of the driver&#8217;s sobriety check procedure. Secondly, the plaintiff was deprived of the right to drive a vehicle for 8 months due to an illegally drawn up protocol. Thirdly, psychological tension and inconveniences resulting from illegal prosecution constitute sufficient grounds for moral damages compensation.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the appellate court resolution and refer the case for a new hearing for repeated detailed examination of all case circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126289835\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Moral Damages from the State due to Illegal Administrative Prosecution by Patrol Police Officers. Main Court Arguments: The Supreme Court established that the appellate court approached the case circumstances formally. Firstly, the previous court proceeding established a violation of the driver&#8217;s sobriety check procedure. Secondly, the plaintiff was deprived of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}