{"id":7911,"date":"2025-04-06T10:09:19","date_gmt":"2025-04-06T07:09:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-910-13240-22-910-14563-23-dated-27-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-06T10:09:19","modified_gmt":"2025-04-06T07:09:19","slug":"case-no-910-13240-22-910-14563-23-dated-27-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-910-13240-22-910-14563-23-dated-27-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/13240\/22 (910\/14563\/23) dated 27\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Subject of Dispute: Reclaiming Immovable Property (Nursery-Kindergarten) from the State Company “Ukrspetsexport” due to Unlawful Disposal of Debtor’s Property during the Moratorium in Bankruptcy Proceedings.<\/p>\n

Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n

1. The moratorium on satisfying creditors’ claims extends to the disputed legal relations, therefore, the executor’s actions to sell the debtor’s property are unlawful.<\/p>\n

2. Each type of electronic auction has its own independent staging and is not a continuous process, therefore, the moment of publishing information about the sale must be determined for each separate stage of the auction.<\/p>\n

3. The Supreme Court deviated from the previous legal position regarding the definition of the “property sale stage”, indicating the need for a narrower interpretation of this concept.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: The case has been referred for a new hearing to establish the good faith\/bad faith of the property acquirer and to verify all circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subject of Dispute: Reclaiming Immovable Property (Nursery-Kindergarten) from the State Company “Ukrspetsexport” due to Unlawful Disposal of Debtor’s Property during the Moratorium in Bankruptcy Proceedings. Main Court Arguments: 1. The moratorium on satisfying creditors’ claims extends to the disputed legal relations, therefore, the executor’s actions to sell the debtor’s property are unlawful. 2. Each type…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}