{"id":7897,"date":"2025-04-06T10:05:45","date_gmt":"2025-04-06T07:05:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-296-6465-21-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-06T10:05:45","modified_gmt":"2025-04-06T07:05:45","slug":"case-no-296-6465-21-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-296-6465-21-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 296\/6465\/21 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute: Claiming a residential apartment from unlawful possession due to the fact that it was alienated from the plaintiff&#8217;s ownership against her will.<\/p>\n<p>Main arguments of the court: The court established that at the moment of the initial case review, the defendant PERSON_2 was the owner of the apartment, but during the appellate proceedings, the apartment was donated to a minor PERSON_7. The appellate court concluded that the claim cannot be satisfied against PERSON_2, as he is no longer the owner of the property. The Supreme Court agreed with this conclusion, noting that the plaintiff has already filed a new lawsuit against the new owner of the apartment in a separate case.<\/p>\n<p>Court decision: To leave the cassation appeal without satisfaction, the appellate court ruling &#8211; unchanged.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126259044\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute: Claiming a residential apartment from unlawful possession due to the fact that it was alienated from the plaintiff&#8217;s ownership against her will. Main arguments of the court: The court established that at the moment of the initial case review, the defendant PERSON_2 was the owner of the apartment, but during the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7897\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}