{"id":7883,"date":"2025-04-05T10:48:17","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T07:48:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-990s%d1%81g%d1%81-21-24-dated-26-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-05T10:48:17","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T07:48:17","slug":"case-no-990s%d1%81g%d1%81-21-24-dated-26-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-990s%d1%81g%d1%81-21-24-dated-26-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 990S\u0421G\u0421\/21\/24 dated 26\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Challenging the Decision of the High Council of Justice on Temporary Suspension of a Judge from Administering Justice for a Period of Three Months.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Court established that the decision on imposing a disciplinary sanction was cancelled by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, which indicated that the High Council of Justice cannot worsen the judge&#8217;s position when appealing a disciplinary sanction. The decision of the High Council of Justice dated 16.07.2024 was cancelled, and therefore, there are no grounds for the temporary suspension of the judge.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The claim is fully satisfied &#8211; the decision of the High Council of Justice dated 22.08.2024 on temporary suspension of the judge from administering justice is declared unlawful and cancelled.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126274775\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Challenging the Decision of the High Council of Justice on Temporary Suspension of a Judge from Administering Justice for a Period of Three Months. Main Arguments of the Court: The Court established that the decision on imposing a disciplinary sanction was cancelled by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, which&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}