{"id":7869,"date":"2025-04-05T10:42:32","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T07:42:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-914-2693-23914-3478-23-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-05T10:42:32","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T07:42:32","slug":"case-no-914-2693-23914-3478-23-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-914-2693-23914-3478-23-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 914\/2693\/23(914\/3478\/23) dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of a Unilateral Legal Transaction &#8211; Statement of Set-off of Counterclaim Homogeneous Requirements.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. In case No. 638\/16545\/20, the fact of the loan repayment due date for PERSON_2 before LLC &#8220;Lutsk Agrarian Company&#8221; was already established.<br \/>\n2. The supplementary agreement dated 26.12.2019 on extending the loan repayment period until 31.12.2032 was not accepted by the court in the previous case due to improper conduct by PERSON_2.<br \/>\n3. The principle of res judicata (finality of judicial decision) precludes repeated consideration of an already resolved dispute regarding loan repayment terms.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the appellate court resolution and uphold the first instance court&#8217;s decision to refuse invalidation of the legal transaction.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding interpretation of judicial decision prejudiciality, emphasizing the priority of the principle of judicial decision finality.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126223978\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of a Unilateral Legal Transaction &#8211; Statement of Set-off of Counterclaim Homogeneous Requirements. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. In case No. 638\/16545\/20, the fact of the loan repayment due date for PERSON_2 before LLC &#8220;Lutsk Agrarian Company&#8221; was already established. 2. The supplementary agreement dated 26.12.2019 on extending the loan&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}