{"id":7809,"date":"2025-04-04T10:19:28","date_gmt":"2025-04-04T07:19:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-272-722-19-dated-20-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-04T10:19:28","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T07:19:28","slug":"case-no-272-722-19-dated-20-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-272-722-19-dated-20-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 272\/722\/19 dated 20\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Criminal Case of Robbery, Theft, and Possession of Narcotic Substances Committed by PERSON_8 and PERSON_9.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The court established that PERSON_8 and PERSON_9 committed a robbery against PERSON_11 and PERSON_12, during which they threatened with a knife and seized property from the victims totaling over 4,000 hryvnias.<br \/>\n&#8211; Evidence of guilt is confirmed by victim testimonies, investigative experiments, crime scene examination protocols, and physical evidence.<br \/>\n&#8211; PERSON_9 voluntarily surrendered narcotic substances (cannabis weighing 69.689 g), which he was storing for personal use.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision:<br \/>\nThe Supreme Court upheld the verdict of conviction against PERSON_8 for robbery (Part 2 of Article 187 of the Criminal Code), but terminated proceedings for theft (Part 3 of Article 185 of the Criminal Code) due to changes in legislation.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126211721\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Criminal Case of Robbery, Theft, and Possession of Narcotic Substances Committed by PERSON_8 and PERSON_9. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The court established that PERSON_8 and PERSON_9 committed a robbery against PERSON_11 and PERSON_12, during which they threatened with a knife and seized property from&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7809"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7809\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}