{"id":7807,"date":"2025-04-04T10:19:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-04T07:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-127-14578-22-dated-25-09-2024\/"},"modified":"2025-04-04T10:19:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T07:19:00","slug":"case-no-127-14578-22-dated-25-09-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-127-14578-22-dated-25-09-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 127\/14578\/22 dated 25\/09\/2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Lawsuit for eviction of a blood uncle from an apartment inherited by a nephew.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; PERSON_2 has a long-standing connection with the apartment since 2003 and is a former family member of the previous owner<br \/>\n&#8211; Eviction would violate the right to respect for housing in accordance with Article 8 of the Human Rights Convention<br \/>\n&#8211; The plaintiff was aware of the apartment&#8217;s encumbrance with the right of use when accepting the inheritance<br \/>\n&#8211; There is no evidence that the respondent is damaging the housing or violating cohabitation rules<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Deny the eviction of PERSON_2 from the apartment.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice of evicting persons who have long resided in the housing.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126211251\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Lawsuit for eviction of a blood uncle from an apartment inherited by a nephew. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; PERSON_2 has a long-standing connection with the apartment since 2003 and is a former family member of the previous owner &#8211; Eviction would violate the right&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7807\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}