{"id":7781,"date":"2025-04-03T10:31:54","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:31:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-240-32865-23-dated-28-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-03T10:31:54","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:31:54","slug":"case-no-240-32865-23-dated-28-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-240-32865-23-dated-28-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 240\/32865\/23 dated 28\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s Inaction as Unlawful Regarding Non-Accrual of Pension Increase for a Minor Affected by the Chornobyl Catastrophe.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and recognized that minor children receiving a survivor&#8217;s pension are non-working pensioners. The Court referred to the Constitutional Court&#8217;s decision, which restored the effect of Article 39 of the Law on Chornobyl Victims&#8217; Status, and to previous Supreme Court resolutions that confirmed the right to a monthly pension increase of two subsistence minimums for persons living in contaminated territories.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Court partially granted the claim, recognizing the Pension Fund&#8217;s inaction as unlawful and obliging it to accrue and pay the pension increase to the minor person from 18.10.2023.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126189571\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s Inaction as Unlawful Regarding Non-Accrual of Pension Increase for a Minor Affected by the Chornobyl Catastrophe. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and recognized that minor children receiving a survivor&#8217;s pension are non-working pensioners. The Court referred to the Constitutional&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7781\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}