{"id":7771,"date":"2025-04-03T10:28:20","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:28:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-642-7743-21-dated-25-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-03T10:28:20","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:28:20","slug":"case-no-642-7743-21-dated-25-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-642-7743-21-dated-25-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 642\/7743\/21 dated 25\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The case concerns abuse of official powers by a police officer during the detention of a driver.<\/p>\n<p>Main arguments of the court:<br \/>\n1. Police officer PERSON_6 unreasonably stopped and detained the driver PERSON_8, contrary to service instructions and legislation.<br \/>\n2. He artificially created a situation of prolonged restriction of personal freedom without legal grounds.<br \/>\n3. A forensic psychological examination confirmed that the police officer&#8217;s actions caused moral damage to the victim in the amount of 108,000 UAH.<\/p>\n<p>The court decided to release PERSON_6 from criminal liability due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court confirmed the correctness of the appellate court&#8217;s decision to release the police officer from liability, despite the established facts of abuse of official powers.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126153440\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The case concerns abuse of official powers by a police officer during the detention of a driver. Main arguments of the court: 1. Police officer PERSON_6 unreasonably stopped and detained the driver PERSON_8, contrary to service instructions and legislation. 2. He artificially created a situation of prolonged restriction of personal freedom without legal grounds. 3.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7771","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7771"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}