{"id":7769,"date":"2025-04-03T10:27:29","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:27:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-464-5445-23-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-03T10:27:29","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:27:29","slug":"case-no-464-5445-23-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-464-5445-23-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 464\/5445\/23 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Lviv City Council demanded the removal of obstacles in disposing of a land plot by demolishing a kiosk belonging to a private entrepreneur.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the dispute arose between the city council and a private entrepreneur regarding a land plot and a kiosk used in entrepreneurial activity. The court concluded that such a dispute cannot be considered under civil court proceedings, as the respondent is a business entity. The court took into account that PERSON_1 has the status of an entrepreneur, has concluded a number of agreements with the city council regarding temporary land use, and has a valid registration as a private entrepreneur.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court reversed previous court decisions and closed the proceedings, explaining to the Lviv City Council the right to apply to the commercial court.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126182532\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Lviv City Council demanded the removal of obstacles in disposing of a land plot by demolishing a kiosk belonging to a private entrepreneur. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the dispute arose between the city council and a private entrepreneur regarding a land plot and a kiosk&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}