{"id":7763,"date":"2025-04-03T10:25:50","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:25:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-757-23415-23-c-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-03T10:25:50","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:25:50","slug":"case-no-757-23415-23-c-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-757-23415-23-c-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 757\/23415\/23-c dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Division of Joint Marital Property – Monetary Funds Amounting to 400,000 US Dollars.<\/p>\n

2. Key Arguments of the Court:
\n– Property acquired by the spouses during marriage belongs to them as joint common property
\n– Respondent’s declaration on property status confirms the availability of monetary funds: 300,000 US Dollars with the respondent and 100,000 US Dollars with the plaintiff
\n– Respondent did not provide evidence that the funds are not joint marital property
\n– Claims for recognition of property as joint property are not an appropriate method of rights protection<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Partial Satisfaction of the Claim – Requirement for Recognizing Funds as Joint Property was Cancelled, but Recovery of 100,000 US Dollars in Favor of the Plaintiff was Maintained.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Division of Joint Marital Property – Monetary Funds Amounting to 400,000 US Dollars. 2. Key Arguments of the Court: – Property acquired by the spouses during marriage belongs to them as joint common property – Respondent’s declaration on property status confirms the availability of monetary funds: 300,000…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7763\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}