{"id":7761,"date":"2025-04-03T10:24:22","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:24:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-169-1006-23-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-03T10:24:22","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:24:22","slug":"case-no-169-1006-23-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-169-1006-23-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 169\/1006\/23 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Return of a Land Parcel to the State, which was Illegally Transferred to Private Ownership.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The land parcel is partially located on forest fund lands that were under permanent use by the state enterprise &#8220;Turiiske Forestry Enterprise&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>2. The transfer of the land parcel to private ownership occurred with violation of land and forest legislation, as part of the parcel belongs to lands of forestry purpose.<\/p>\n<p>3. The Appellate Court incorrectly assessed the evidence and did not take into account the prejudicial significance of the decision in case No. 169\/507\/22, which confirms the illegality of the land parcel transfer.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the resolution of the appellate court and refer the case for a new review to thoroughly examine the case circumstances and legal regime of the land parcel.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126182553\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Return of a Land Parcel to the State, which was Illegally Transferred to Private Ownership. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The land parcel is partially located on forest fund lands that were under permanent use by the state enterprise &#8220;Turiiske Forestry Enterprise&#8221;. 2. The transfer of the land parcel to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7761\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}