{"id":7755,"date":"2025-04-03T10:21:46","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:21:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/04\/case-no-918-443-24-dated-18-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-04-03T10:21:46","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T07:21:46","slug":"case-no-918-443-24-dated-18-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/04\/case-no-918-443-24-dated-18-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 918\/443\/24 dated 18\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Claiming a land plot of 3.7483 hectares into communal ownership from the illegal possession of an individual and a farming enterprise.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. PERSON_2, as a member of the farming enterprise &#8220;Valentyna&#8221;, received the land plot free of charge without transferring it to the enterprise.<br \/>\n2. After receiving the plot, PERSON_2 did not engage in farming activities but immediately leased it to the same farming enterprise.<br \/>\n3. The purpose of obtaining the land plot was not to create a farming enterprise, but to obtain land free of charge outside of a competitive process.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court reversed the decisions of previous instances and closed the proceedings, indicating that such a dispute should be considered under civil judicial procedure.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126180674\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Claiming a land plot of 3.7483 hectares into communal ownership from the illegal possession of an individual and a farming enterprise. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. PERSON_2, as a member of the farming enterprise &#8220;Valentyna&#8221;, received the land plot free of charge without transferring it to the enterprise. 2. After&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}