{"id":7631,"date":"2025-03-31T10:11:04","date_gmt":"2025-03-31T07:11:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-8781-23-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-31T10:11:04","modified_gmt":"2025-03-31T07:11:04","slug":"case-no-910-8781-23-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-8781-23-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/8781\/23 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n

Subject of Dispute: Early Termination of the Trademark Certificate for “EUROCASH” due to Non-Use within Five Years.<\/p>\n

Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n

1. The court clearly defined for the first time that the five-year period of non-use of a trademark does not start anew when its owner changes. This period is calculated from the moment of the original trademark registration.<\/p>\n

2. The Plaintiff (Eurocash S.A.) proved that it cannot register its own trademark due to the existence of the previously registered trademark of the Defendant, which is not actually used.<\/p>\n

3. The Defendant (LLC “Dominus-K”) did not provide convincing evidence of using the trademark “EUROCASH” for services of classes 35 and 42 of the NICE Classification during the last five years.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: Early Termination of the Trademark Certificate for “EUROCASH” for services of classes 35 and 42 of the NICE Classification.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis: Subject of Dispute: Early Termination of the Trademark Certificate for “EUROCASH” due to Non-Use within Five Years. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The court clearly defined for the first time that the five-year period of non-use of a trademark does not start anew when its owner…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7631\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}