{"id":7625,"date":"2025-03-31T10:09:24","date_gmt":"2025-03-31T07:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-380-3979-24-dated-27-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-31T10:09:24","modified_gmt":"2025-03-31T07:09:24","slug":"case-no-380-3979-24-dated-27-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-380-3979-24-dated-27-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 380\/3979\/24 dated 27\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: A Serviceman Demands Recalculation and Payment of Monetary Compensation for the Period from February to December 2020.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The Supreme Court deviated from previous positions regarding the terms of court appeal, forming a new legal stance.<\/p>\n<p>2. Until July 19, 2022, legislation did not limit the period for an employee to file a lawsuit for wage recovery.<\/p>\n<p>3. Since the disputed legal relations arose before July 19, 2022, the old version of the law applies, which allowed filing a lawsuit without time limitations.<\/p>\n<p>4. The Court of Appeal erroneously applied the new version of the law, which limits the appeal period to three months.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Revoke the resolution of the appellate court and refer the case for a new hearing.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126169053\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: A Serviceman Demands Recalculation and Payment of Monetary Compensation for the Period from February to December 2020. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Supreme Court deviated from previous positions regarding the terms of court appeal, forming a new legal stance. 2. Until July 19, 2022, legislation did not limit the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7625\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}