{"id":7597,"date":"2025-03-30T10:10:14","date_gmt":"2025-03-30T07:10:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-924-1223-23-dated-18-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-30T10:10:14","modified_gmt":"2025-03-30T07:10:14","slug":"case-no-924-1223-23-dated-18-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-924-1223-23-dated-18-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 924\/1223\/23 dated 18\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the actions of the Novousytska Settlement Council as unlawful regarding the sale of land lease rights and invalidation of the lease agreement.<\/p>\n

2. Key Court Arguments:
\n– LLC “Impeks” purchased a gas station previously owned by LLC “Technogaz”
\n– The previous land lease agreement was valid until the liquidation of LLC “Technogaz”
\n– Courts did not fully investigate the issue of land lease rights transfer to the new property owner
\n– All case circumstances were not established, and no expertise was conducted regarding the location of real estate objects<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Repeal previous court decisions and refer the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance for comprehensive investigation of circumstances.<\/p>\n

Note: The court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding the interpretation of land lease rights transfer when the property owner changes.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the actions of the Novousytska Settlement Council as unlawful regarding the sale of land lease rights and invalidation of the lease agreement. 2. Key Court Arguments: – LLC “Impeks” purchased a gas station previously owned by LLC “Technogaz” – The previous land lease agreement was…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7597\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}