{"id":7595,"date":"2025-03-30T10:09:04","date_gmt":"2025-03-30T07:09:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-460-3636-24-dated-25-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-30T10:09:04","modified_gmt":"2025-03-30T07:09:04","slug":"case-no-460-3636-24-dated-25-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-460-3636-24-dated-25-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 460\/3636\/24 dated 25\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s inaction as unlawful regarding non-accrual of pension supplement to a minor child residing in a radioactively contaminated territory.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; Minor children receiving survivor&#8217;s pension are considered non-working pensioners<br \/>\n&#8211; The Chornobyl Disaster Law does not limit the right to supplement based on age or pension type<br \/>\n&#8211; Children cannot independently choose their place of residence, therefore parents&#8217; residence is taken into account<br \/>\n&#8211; The court deviates from previous practice that did not recognize minors&#8217; right to such supplement<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the claim and oblige the Pension Fund to accrue a pension supplement to the minor child in the amount of two subsistence minimums.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126136678\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s inaction as unlawful regarding non-accrual of pension supplement to a minor child residing in a radioactively contaminated territory. 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; Minor children receiving survivor&#8217;s pension are considered non-working pensioners &#8211; The Chornobyl Disaster Law does not limit the right&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7595\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}