{"id":7593,"date":"2025-03-30T10:08:27","date_gmt":"2025-03-30T07:08:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-480-7451-23-dated-25-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-30T10:08:27","modified_gmt":"2025-03-30T07:08:27","slug":"case-no-480-7451-23-dated-25-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-480-7451-23-dated-25-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 480\/7451\/23 dated 25\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: A serviceman challenges the incorrect determination of the allowance for service specifics and bonus in the reference on monetary compensation for pension recalculation.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n1. The Supreme Court indicated that the approach to specifying different percentage indicators of allowance and bonus for pensioners in minimum amounts is unlawful.<br \/>\n2. Previous instance courts did not investigate the actual payment amounts for the plaintiff&#8217;s position in January 2023.<br \/>\n3. Courts must request evidence of actual allowance and bonus amounts, rather than relying on assumptions.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Annul the decisions of previous instances and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for additional clarification of circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126136645\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: A serviceman challenges the incorrect determination of the allowance for service specifics and bonus in the reference on monetary compensation for pension recalculation. Main Court Arguments: 1. The Supreme Court indicated that the approach to specifying different percentage indicators of allowance and bonus for pensioners in minimum amounts is unlawful. 2. Previous&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7593\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}