{"id":7576,"date":"2025-03-29T09:24:41","date_gmt":"2025-03-29T07:24:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-633-195-17-dated-20-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-29T09:24:41","modified_gmt":"2025-03-29T07:24:41","slug":"case-no-633-195-17-dated-20-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-633-195-17-dated-20-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 633\/195\/17 dated 20\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the court decision analysis:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Criminal case concerning a civil protection service major who committed violence against a subordinate during a service conflict.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court for the first time determined that State Emergency Service employees can be considered law enforcement officers. The court was based on the following criteria:<br \/>\n&#8211; Presence of law enforcement function (right to bring to administrative responsibility)<br \/>\n&#8211; Possibility of receiving pension for years of service as law enforcement officers<br \/>\n&#8211; Systematic analysis of legislation on the status of state authorities<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Leave the appellate court&#8217;s verdict unchanged &#8211; recognize PERSON_7 guilty under part 2 of Article 365 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (exceeding official powers with violence) and impose a punishment of 5 years of imprisonment with a probation period.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126088586\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the court decision analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: Criminal case concerning a civil protection service major who committed violence against a subordinate during a service conflict. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court for the first time determined that State Emergency Service employees can be considered law enforcement&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}