{"id":7574,"date":"2025-03-29T09:23:37","date_gmt":"2025-03-29T07:23:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-2604-20992-12-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-29T09:23:37","modified_gmt":"2025-03-29T07:23:37","slug":"case-no-2604-20992-12-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-2604-20992-12-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 2604\/20992\/12 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is a summary of the court decision:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of the dispute: recovery of debt under a credit agreement from an individual.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main arguments of the court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The bank demanded recovery of interest, penalty, and expenses under the executive note<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court of Appeal partially satisfied the claims, reducing the amount of recovery<br \/>\n&#8211; The Supreme Court identified procedural violations in the part of accruing interest and penalty<\/p>\n<p>3. Court decision: &#8211; The Supreme Court cancelled part of the Court of Appeal&#8217;s decision regarding interest and penalty, sending the case for a new review.<\/p>\n<p>Key feature &#8211; the court thoroughly analyzed the rules of interest accrual after presenting a claim for early loan repayment.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126088338\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is a summary of the court decision: 1. Subject of the dispute: recovery of debt under a credit agreement from an individual. 2. Main arguments of the court: &#8211; The bank demanded recovery of interest, penalty, and expenses under the executive note &#8211; The Court of Appeal partially satisfied the claims, reducing the amount&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7574\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}