{"id":7522,"date":"2025-03-28T09:34:24","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T07:34:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-760-20240-17-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-28T09:34:24","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T07:34:24","slug":"case-no-760-20240-17-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-760-20240-17-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 760\/20240\/17 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Division of Jointly Owned Marital Property, including corporate rights, real estate, vehicles, and debt obligations.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>The court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding division of spouses&#8217; corporate rights. In particular, it recognized that one spouse may claim payment of a share in the company&#8217;s authorized capital, and not just half of the contribution.<\/p>\n<p>The court was guided by the following fundamental provisions:<br \/>\n&#8211; Property acquired during marriage is considered joint shared ownership<br \/>\n&#8211; Each spouse has equal rights to possession and disposal of joint property<br \/>\n&#8211; Debts of the spouses are also taken into account during property division<br \/>\n&#8211; Disposal of joint property without the consent of the other spouse is unlawful<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partial satisfaction of the claim &#8211; recovery in favor of the plaintiff of compensations:<br \/>\n&#8211; For share in the authorized capital of LLC &#8220;ES KI MO&#8221; &#8211; 1,226,000 UAH<br \/>\n&#8211; For debt obligations &#8211; 132,743.75 UAH<br \/>\n&#8211; For property rights to real estate &#8211; 1,030,806 UAH<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126054378\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Division of Jointly Owned Marital Property, including corporate rights, real estate, vehicles, and debt obligations. 2. Key Court Arguments: The court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding division of spouses&#8217; corporate rights. In particular, it recognized that one spouse may claim payment of a share in the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}