{"id":7518,"date":"2025-03-28T09:31:51","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T07:31:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-1986-22-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-28T09:31:51","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T07:31:51","slug":"case-no-904-1986-22-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-1986-22-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 904\/1986\/22 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal text summary:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Housing Cooperative (OSBB) challenges the purchase and sale agreement and ownership certificates for auxiliary premises of a multi-apartment building.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; Auxiliary premises are common property of the building&#8217;s co-owners<br \/>\n&#8211; The Housing Cooperative has the right to apply to court to protect co-owners&#8217; rights<br \/>\n&#8211; Previous courts incorrectly chose the method of protecting rights, considering vindication as the only possible option<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Revoke the decisions of previous instances and refer the case for a new review to the appellate court.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court essentially changed the previous judicial practice regarding methods of protecting rights to auxiliary premises in multi-apartment buildings.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126054096\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal text summary: 1. Subject of Dispute: Housing Cooperative (OSBB) challenges the purchase and sale agreement and ownership certificates for auxiliary premises of a multi-apartment building. 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; Auxiliary premises are common property of the building&#8217;s co-owners &#8211; The Housing Cooperative has the right to apply&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7518\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}