{"id":7506,"date":"2025-03-28T09:24:43","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T07:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-140-32696-23-dated-24-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-28T09:24:43","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T07:24:43","slug":"case-no-140-32696-23-dated-24-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-140-32696-23-dated-24-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 140\/32696\/23 dated 24\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging tax authority decisions on refusal to register tax invoices in the Unified Tax Invoice Register.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The taxpayer (PE &#8220;UKR-PETROL&#8221;) did not exercise the right to provide additional explanations and documents after receiving notifications from the tax authority.<br \/>\n&#8211; Changes to Procedure No. 520 from March 2023 established a clear mechanism for interaction between the taxpayer and the controlling body when suspending tax invoice registration.<br \/>\n&#8211; Failure to submit additional documents within the specified timeframe is grounds for refusing tax invoice registration.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the cassation appeal, cancel previous instance decisions regarding most tax invoices and reject the claim. Maintain the decision unchanged for 9 tax invoices where the tax authority did not send additional notifications.<\/p>\n<p>Specific Feature: The court essentially modified the previous practice of considering tax invoice registration cases, clearly defining the algorithm of actions for the taxpayer and the controlling body.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126071572\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging tax authority decisions on refusal to register tax invoices in the Unified Tax Invoice Register. 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; The taxpayer (PE &#8220;UKR-PETROL&#8221;) did not exercise the right to provide additional explanations and documents after receiving notifications from the tax authority. &#8211; Changes to Procedure&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7506\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}