{"id":7460,"date":"2025-03-27T10:40:16","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-460-9966-23-dated-21-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:40:16","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:40:16","slug":"case-no-460-9966-23-dated-21-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-460-9966-23-dated-21-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 460\/9966\/23 dated 21\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging orders on disciplinary proceedings and dismissal of a civil servant for violation of the Oath.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; Dismissal for violation of the Oath is possible only with clear proof of misconduct against service interests<br \/>\n&#8211; The Disciplinary Commission did not provide specific facts of non-performance of official duties<br \/>\n&#8211; It is improper to hold a person liable for collective decisions<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court pointed out that cancellation of the disciplinary responsibility order is not an automatic basis for reinstatement<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for a more detailed examination of dismissal circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126036881\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging orders on disciplinary proceedings and dismissal of a civil servant for violation of the Oath. 2. Key Arguments of the Court: &#8211; Dismissal for violation of the Oath is possible only with clear proof of misconduct against service interests &#8211; The Disciplinary Commission did not provide&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7460\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}