{"id":7456,"date":"2025-03-27T10:39:23","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-460-21394-23-dated-21-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:39:23","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:39:23","slug":"case-no-460-21394-23-dated-21-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-460-21394-23-dated-21-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 460\/21394\/23 dated 21\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of a serviceman&#8217;s monetary provision for the period from February 2020 to March 2023.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>The court essentially changes its previous legal position regarding the calculation of terms for filing a lawsuit. It established that:<\/p>\n<p>1. Until July 19, 2022, the old version of the Labor Code was in effect, which allowed filing a lawsuit without time limitation.<\/p>\n<p>2. After July 19, 2022, a three-month term for filing a lawsuit was introduced.<\/p>\n<p>3. Given the COVID-19 quarantine, the countdown of the three-month term began on July 1, 2023.<\/p>\n<p>4. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit on September 11, 2023, which means he did not miss the established term.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the resolution of the appellate court, which left the claim without consideration, and to send the case for a new review to the appellate court.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126036858\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of a serviceman&#8217;s monetary provision for the period from February 2020 to March 2023. Main Arguments of the Court: The court essentially changes its previous legal position regarding the calculation of terms for filing a lawsuit. It established that: 1. Until July 19, 2022, the old version&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}