{"id":7454,"date":"2025-03-27T10:38:47","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:38:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-757-55084-21-c-dated-21-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:38:47","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:38:47","slug":"case-no-757-55084-21-c-dated-21-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-757-55084-21-c-dated-21-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 757\/55084\/21-c dated 21\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery from PrivatBank of the deposit amount and accrued interest under a contract that the bank refuses to execute.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n1. The bank received a statement from the client about terminating the deposit agreement and returning funds, but did not fulfill its obligations.<br \/>\n2. The client did not consent to the transfer of debt to another financial company, therefore PrivatBank remains responsible for the contract.<br \/>\n3. The court confirmed previous judicial practice regarding the impossibility of changing the debtor without explicit written consent from the client.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To uphold the previous court decisions on recovering the deposit amount and interest from PrivatBank in favor of the client.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126021103\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery from PrivatBank of the deposit amount and accrued interest under a contract that the bank refuses to execute. Main Court Arguments: 1. The bank received a statement from the client about terminating the deposit agreement and returning funds, but did not fulfill its obligations. 2. The client did not consent to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}