{"id":7450,"date":"2025-03-27T10:37:58","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:37:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-947-23505-20-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:37:58","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:37:58","slug":"case-no-947-23505-20-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-947-23505-20-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 947\/23505\/20 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

Subject of Dispute: Determining the Place of Residence of a Minor Child after Parents’ Divorce.<\/p>\n

Main Arguments of the Court:
\n1. The child’s mother transported the son to the Russian Federation without the father’s consent, violating the parental rights of PERSON_2.
\n2. Relocating the child to another country creates obstacles for the father’s communication with the son and contradicts the best interests of the child.
\n3. The father properly fulfills parental responsibilities and has the potential for child-rearing.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: The Supreme Court canceled the decision of the appellate court and upheld the first instance court’s decision on determining the child’s place of residence with the father.<\/p>\n

Note: The court deviated from previous practice, emphasizing that the child’s interests are paramount, especially when one parent creates obstacles for communication and upbringing.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: Subject of Dispute: Determining the Place of Residence of a Minor Child after Parents’ Divorce. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The child’s mother transported the son to the Russian Federation without the father’s consent, violating the parental rights of PERSON_2. 2. Relocating the child to another country creates obstacles for…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7450"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7450\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}