{"id":7448,"date":"2025-03-27T10:37:23","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:37:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-347-783-21-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:37:23","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:37:23","slug":"case-no-347-783-21-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-347-783-21-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 347\/783\/21 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the village council’s decision on land plot transfer to ownership and cancellation of the state ownership certificate.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n The Supreme Court indicated that invalidating the village council’s decision and the state certificate is not an effective method of rights protection. The court noted that the appropriate method of protection is a vindication claim for recovering the part of the land plot that overlaps another’s land plot. Moreover, cancelling the decision would deprive the defendant of ownership rights to a plot that is not disputed.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The appellate court’s resolution was cancelled, the first instance court’s decision on rejecting the claim was maintained, but the reasoning part of the decision was modified.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the village council’s decision on land plot transfer to ownership and cancellation of the state ownership certificate. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court indicated that invalidating the village council’s decision and the state certificate is not an effective…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}