{"id":7442,"date":"2025-03-27T10:35:23","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:35:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-179-657-19-dated-13-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:35:23","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:35:23","slug":"case-no-179-657-19-dated-13-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-179-657-19-dated-13-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 179\/657\/19 dated 13\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Claiming a land plot of 10.76 hectares from illegal possession of Farm Enterprise &#8220;Dnipro Chornozems&#8221; and challenging the contract termination agreement.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The plaintiff claims that they did not sign the contract terminating the lease agreement dated October 15, 2018<br \/>\n&#8211; The court of first instance recognized the contract as not concluded due to the respondent&#8217;s failure to provide the original contract<br \/>\n&#8211; The appellate court considered the contract valid and rejected the claim<br \/>\n&#8211; The cassation court indicated that the appellate court incorrectly applied legal norms and did not verify the circumstances regarding contract signing<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: The cassation court revoked the appellate court&#8217;s resolution and referred the case for a new review to the appellate instance.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court drew attention to the fact that a transaction that was not executed cannot be declared invalid.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126020992\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Claiming a land plot of 10.76 hectares from illegal possession of Farm Enterprise &#8220;Dnipro Chornozems&#8221; and challenging the contract termination agreement. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; The plaintiff claims that they did not sign the contract terminating the lease agreement dated October 15, 2018 &#8211; The court&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}