{"id":7438,"date":"2025-03-27T10:33:31","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:33:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-159-5846-23-dated-13-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:33:31","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:33:31","slug":"case-no-159-5846-23-dated-13-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-159-5846-23-dated-13-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 159\/5846\/23 dated 13\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of a land plot sale and purchase agreement due to suspicion of fraudulent transaction (legal act aimed at causing harm to the creditor).<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The court noted that private law instruments must be used in good faith, without abuse of rights<br \/>\n&#8211; The absence of a court decision on debt recovery does not preclude the possibility of recognizing the transaction as fraudulent<br \/>\n&#8211; It is important to prove that the transaction was made with the purpose of avoiding debt payment or reducing the debtor&#8217;s property<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Rescind previous court decisions and refer the case for a new hearing to thoroughly investigate the circumstances of the transaction&#8217;s fraudulent nature.<\/p>\n<p>: The court deviated from previous practice regarding the assessment of fraudulent transactions.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126020993\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of a land plot sale and purchase agreement due to suspicion of fraudulent transaction (legal act aimed at causing harm to the creditor). 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The court noted that private law instruments must be used in good faith, without abuse of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7438"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7438\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}