{"id":7436,"date":"2025-03-27T10:32:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:32:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-755-12923-24-dated-13-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:32:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:32:48","slug":"case-no-755-12923-24-dated-13-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-755-12923-24-dated-13-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 755\/12923\/24 dated 13\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Establishing the Legal Fact of a Father&#8217;s Independent Care and Upbringing of a Minor Child and Declaring the Child&#8217;s Mother as Missing.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court drew attention to the fact that the courts of previous instances incorrectly assessed the application, considering it solely about establishing the fact of the child&#8217;s upbringing by the father. In reality, the applicant (father) acted as the legal representative of the child and also requested to declare the mother missing, which is a separate procedural action in the order of special proceedings. The courts did not clarify the procedural status of the applicant, did not investigate evidence regarding the whereabouts of the child&#8217;s mother and the necessity of declaring her missing.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the decisions of the courts of previous instances and refer the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance for a complete and comprehensive investigation of the circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126020998\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Establishing the Legal Fact of a Father&#8217;s Independent Care and Upbringing of a Minor Child and Declaring the Child&#8217;s Mother as Missing. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court drew attention to the fact that the courts of previous instances incorrectly assessed the application, considering it solely about establishing the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}