{"id":7410,"date":"2025-03-27T10:22:16","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:22:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-922-592-24-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:22:16","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:22:16","slug":"case-no-922-592-24-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-922-592-24-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 922\/592\/24 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt for electricity distribution services and reactive electricity energy transfers, as well as 3% per annum and inflationary losses.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Defendant (LLC &#8220;New Systems AM&#8221;) did not timely pay for electricity distribution services for the period of March-September 2023<br \/>\n&#8211; The court considered the possibility of reducing 3% per annum and inflationary losses<br \/>\n&#8211; The Supreme Court confirmed the court&#8217;s right to reduce the amount of per annum interest under certain conditions, but this is a right, not an obligation of the court<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court of Appeal prematurely rejected the motion to reduce without proper substantiation<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: To cancel the resolution of the appellate court regarding the recovery of 3% per annum and refer this part of the case for a new review to the commercial appellate court.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126020074\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt for electricity distribution services and reactive electricity energy transfers, as well as 3% per annum and inflationary losses. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; The Defendant (LLC &#8220;New Systems AM&#8221;) did not timely pay for electricity distribution services for the period of March-September 2023 &#8211;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7410\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}