{"id":7396,"date":"2025-03-27T10:17:07","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:17:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-917-526-24-dated-20-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:17:07","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:17:07","slug":"case-no-917-526-24-dated-20-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-917-526-24-dated-20-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 917\/526\/24 dated 20\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of JSC “Poltavaoblenergo” decision on additional charging for unaccounted electrical energy based on seal damage at the metering point.<\/p>\n

2. Key Court Arguments:
\n– During inspection, damage to the PPKO seal on the metering cabinet was discovered
\n– Expert examination recorded traces of thermal and mechanical impact on the seal
\n– Contractual relations exist between parties regarding electricity distribution
\n– Previous courts considered the additional charging legitimate<\/p>\n

3. Supreme Court Decision: Revoke decisions of previous instances and refer the case for new consideration due to improper evaluation of evidence regarding seal damage.<\/p>\n

Important: – The court deviated from previous practice in assessing expert investigations of seal damages.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of JSC “Poltavaoblenergo” decision on additional charging for unaccounted electrical energy based on seal damage at the metering point. 2. Key Court Arguments: – During inspection, damage to the PPKO seal on the metering cabinet was discovered – Expert examination recorded traces…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}